Partnerships

Useful alliances, not logo gardens.

We partner when it helps teams ship better systems: sharper implementation, stronger infrastructure, cleaner research, or warmer paths to real problems.

4
Review tracks
48h
First reply window
No wrapper work
Operating rule

Where partnership makes sense

Each track needs a clear owner, a real operating advantage, and a reason clients benefit.

System architecture

For teams past the demo stage that need the runtime, tool layer, and artifact surface designed or rebuilt.

  • Agent runtime
  • Tool contracts
  • Artifact UX
Open track

Cost and latency audit

For loops where repeated context, slow routes, or provider choices are turning into operating expense.

  • Prompt caching
  • Routing
  • Route budgets
Open track

Evaluation harness

For teams that need golden sets, deterministic checks, judge rubrics, or release gates around model behavior.

  • Golden sets
  • Runtime checks
  • Judge rubrics
Open track

Domain model review

For specialized domains where frontier APIs need controlled data, fine-tuning, or pre-handoff verification.

  • Domain fixtures
  • Fine-tuning
  • Mismatch detection
Open track

Partnership rules

No referral theater, no vague ecosystems, no reselling work we cannot stand behind.

  1. Every shared opportunity starts with a problem brief.
  2. Each side owns one clear part of the delivery.
  3. The client sees the operating model before they see a pitch.

Bring the system
before it becomes expensive.

We review agent runtimes, eval harnesses, artifact flows, and domain models when the risk is concrete enough to deserve serious architecture.